you yourselves wrong

In this I call them morons by prejudging their article based on media distrust and past experience with their unbalanced coverage of all things religious. For a second there, I believed I was going to post a retraction. But by article's end, it was clear to me that moron stays.

First, the article slips in little pieces of antiChristian and antitruth hatred, things like the Christian faith's main beliefs are malleable and have changed over time based upon the whims of men. Secondly, it makes mention that the Gospels differ in their accounts of post-Resurrection stories, and suggests they are from differing early faiths that coalesce to form Christianity.

Most egregious is that the article says nothing. It's argument is based on one of the ones offered by non-morons such as Strobel and McDowell -- that the resurrection story is too outrageous to have been made up during a time when Christians were persecuted for their faith. A more believable and real story would have been chosen had a story been chosen. But the article is so flimsy it makes the argument sound flimsier than what it is in actuality.

If you hate us, fine, moron. Take it to the Creator on JDay. I hear He's a big fan of antiChristians. In fact, He made a whole lake for them.