where then is that sense

Love how this seems to make sense to scientists. Finding fossils that dispute previously-held beliefs don't overturn the old beliefs. They don't overturn notions of faulty age estimates. They don't overturn faulty notions of species interaction. They don't overturn clearly faulty notions on the development of modern environments.

What happens? Merely an overlapping of theories, or adjustments. If this were to happen in Middle Eastern digs into the historical record of Christ, if small disputes were found, whole religions would be completely decimated and explained away. Articles would appear chastising all who believe in apparently faulty systems. But in science? Free pass.

Your faulty reasoning skills used in torturously ridiculous ways to save your jobs also blind you to the truth of your eventual outcomes before the throne. You might not see the connection twixt your ignorance and willful backturning on the faith and the lake awaiting you, but that is not proof of the lack of existence of the outcome, but rather proof of your inability to see truth.